First Lady, Not President, Will Present Chicago’s Olympic Case

Michelle ObamaDoug Mills/The New York Times First Lady Michelle Obama appeared at an event in the East Room in April.

Update | 3:42 p.m.
President Obama announced on Friday that he would not fly to Denmark next month to help Chicago, his adopted hometown, win the right to host the Summer Olympics of 2016. He said he would send his wife, First Lady Michelle Obama, instead.

Mr. Obama informed the International Olympic Committee on Friday that he needs to focus on the effort to pass health care legislation and would be unable to attend the Oct. 2nd meeting in Copenhagen, according to a statement released by the White House. He said he would continue to support Chicago’s bid along with the first lady and Valerie Jarrett, one of his senior advisors, who will accompany Mrs. Obama to Denmark next month.

The president’s decision to stay home comes despite pressure from some political allies, including Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley. Officials are keenly aware that Mr. Obama might be criticized for devoting time to such a venture at a moment of great national challenges, particularly if the Chicago bid fails.

Still, the White House clearly wanted to send a high-power emissary. It has become increasingly common for national leaders to lobby for their cities. In 2005, Tony Blair, Britain’s prime minister at the time, went to Singapore to lobby successfully for London’s bid to host the 2012 Games. In 2007, Vladimir V. Putin, then Russia’s president, went to Guatemala, where he won the right to host the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi.

This year, the heads of state representing Chicago’s three rivals — Rio de Janeiro, Madrid and Tokyo — are expected to go to Copenhagen for the Oct. 2 vote by the I.O.C. Chicago, once viewed as the frontrunner, now appears to be lagging, according to Olympics watchers.

Mrs. Obama, who was born on the South Side of Chicago, would clearly bring some star power to the meeting while allowing the president to focus on pressing matters closer to home. Ms. Jarrett, a close friend of the first lady, heads the newly created White House office on the Olympics and served as vice chairwoman of the Chicago 2016 bid group.

“It is with great pride that I will go to Copenhagen to make the case for the United States to host the 2016 Olympics,” Mrs. Obama said in a statement. “There is no doubt in my mind that Chicago would offer the world a fantastic setting for these historic games and I hope that the Olympic torch will have the chance to burn brightly in my hometown.”

Patrick G. Ryan, chairman and chief executive of the Chicago 2016 bid committee, said bid officials were thrilled that Mrs. Obama would be in Copenhagen for the meeting. He said she would travel to Denmark before the vote, with enough time to meet the IOC members, and would be part of the bid’s final presentation.

“I think that Michelle Obama will represent our country, our city, our bid in a tremendous way,” Mr. Ryan said at a news conference Friday in Chicago. “It’s her hometown. She comes from an athletic family. They are all in sports. I think it’s a great opportunity for us.”

He said he also understood why President Obama would likely forego the trip. “He’s got important issue that he’s identified and that he’s working on,” Mr. Ryan said. “He has to see that through.”

Still, Mr. Obama’s decision will clearly disappoint some of his friends in Chicago. Mayor Daley has repeatedly described the president as a key player in his win-the-games strategy, describing Mr. Obama in March as the “quarterback” who would bring the Olympics to Chicago.
On Friday, however, Mr. Daley praised Mr. Obama’s decision to send the first lady, saying he was “deeply grateful” for the continuing support of the president and first lady.

“As a lifelong resident of our city, Michelle’s passion for Chicago is contagious and she will be able to share her unique perspective as to why Chicago and its residents are poised to further the Olympic movement across our country and around the world,” Mr. Daley said in a statement.

Juliet Macur contributed reporting from Chicago.

Update | 7:34 p.m. Update | 7:35 p.m.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Man I love the First Lady. She will definitely sway the committee to host the Olympics in Chicago. But will hosting such a gigantic event be good for Chicago? Think of the debt that will be incurred. Is it worth it?

John Biggs

While I feel terrible hoping that Michelle fails at anything, I have to say I hope this effort does fail. As a Chicagoan, I have to agree with John Biggs’ skepticism. I do think the taxpayers will be stuck with a big bill and that only friends of the mayor are likely to make out on the deal.

GO Michelle!

good move she can win over the Olympic committee

The United States has serious budget problems. Why should federal taxpayers spend over a billion dollars, to secure the Olympic Games? President Obama should know the difference between a want and a need and withdraw the bid.

still more evidence we elected the wrong obama.

Oh, I definitely hope that Chicago gets it. It will be nice to see President Palin in attendance at the 2016 games. While Michelle and Barack scowl at the interloper who unseated them four years earlier!

Why is BO sending Michelle? She is not an official, she is just the spouse of one. I thought that if the President could not fulfill the responsibilities of his post, then the VP was supposed to…

Of course, michelle will try to sell the Olymics for Chicago! Can you see Daley, Stoeger, Obama, Jesse jackson, Bobby Rush, Louis Farrakhan, and the rest of the Chicago democrat theives administer hundeds of millions of dollars!!! Just a shame blago won’t be there to negotiate the parking concession or rezko to help out with some property development. As a life long Chicagoan, raised in Paddy Bauler’s 42 ward I can assure you that If this kind of money is available to the chicago democrat machine, it will make the old man’s shennanigans look like a Sunday school picnic. Incidentally, no chance of some of the money finding its way back to the selection committee. The only thing that can save us would be if michelle selects her own clothes for the meeting, that will kill it.

AK……At the rate she is falling, Sarah The Quitter would be lucky to be able to win the Presidency of the Wasilla PTA.

Oh, please, NOT Chicago. It’s a city rife with political corruption and awful race relations. Its culinary options don’t go far beyond deep dish pizza and bratwurst. People can’t talk about much more than football. The Blues? Same three chords played over and over until the audience falls off their seats with boredom.

This New Yorker is rooting for Rio and Madrid. Let’s at least pick a city where visitors can have some fun.

I cant help but think of all he job creation this would start. Uof I will be used for some events. places all over the state will get some good economy over this… especialy in building the olympic vlliage. It will be good for all if Illinois wins the bid. Michell is the perfect person to send…prez is too busy, but everyone love michelle, the chicago girl now first lady. It is a good story and she will do us all proud and maybe even bring good jobs for olympics.

Oh what a wonderous nation our America is. Where on one end of the spectrum a poor black kid from the south side of Chicago. Can graduate Harvard Law School. Marry an attractive educated and accomplished woman. And be elected President of these United States. On the far other end. Guys can grow up fostering ignorant,intolerant views. Drop out of school. Yet can still gather a following of like minded neo fascist idiots and go on to have their own radio and televisions shows and become multi millionaires from the sponsorship of greedy Corporations. Yes indeed. A marvelous nation where anything is possible.

Anything for the Chicago crowd. Smacks of cronyism!

“No, Chicago is not really the least livable city in the US.”

Good luck, Mrs. Obama.

Mark Wilkes Barre PA September 13, 2009 · 6:28 am

OH, what a wonderous nation our america is.
—- Mike Allen

Yes,
a feel good story like this, produces a comment like # 13

NO, chicago is not really the least livable city in the US
—- Steve bolger

You said it brother,
My city ” EARNED ” that title……..
Our leaders wear that badge without the least bit of shame….

Does the far right EVER stop hating?

I have volunteered for Chicago 2016. However, as a land use planner, I am dead set against the bid. Chicago does NOT have the infrastructure to accomodate a million people in a 2 week span, on top of the several million people who work and live in the city, or commute to the city or out of the city for work. The Chicago Tranist Authority (CTA) is running on antiquated infrastructure. All of the events and amenities are located near Lake Michigan, which is no where near any major interstate network.

Daley has been planning this for years, and has used the bid to rationalize everything from heavy infrastructure spending, park development, to waterfront development. In early 2008 at a workshop sponsored through the American Planning Association, the presenters indicated that most of the transport would be by mass transit, which will turn out to be an utter nightmare.

If Obama does not show up himself, it will severely damage the bid. But then again, maybe it IS the right move after all :)

AK, Palin as president? Where will you find the 50% plus one who will fill out the ballot for her? There aren’t quite enough crazy people in the Republican base to put her over the top.