Queen Elizabeth II Addresses the General Assembly

Queen ElizabethTodd Heisler/The New York Times Queen Elizabeth II arrives to address members of the United Nations General Assembly.

Update, July 7 | Full coverage of the Queen’s visit can be found here.

UNITED NATIONS – Queen Elizabeth II addressed the United Nations for the first time since 1957 on Tuesday, paying homage to the organization’s accomplishments since she last stood at the famous green podium of the General Assembly.

“In my lifetime, the United Nations has moved from being a high-minded aspiration to being a real force for common good,” she told the packed hall.

It was a brief speech (see text), just eight minutes, assuring that  the queen’s remarks would not join the annals of infamous harangues from the podium delivered by long-reigning leaders like Muammar al-Qaddafi, who spoke for more than 90 minutes last fall, or Fidel Castro of Cuba. It was the first of three public visits during the queen’s daylong stop in New York City.

On her first visit, just four years after she took the throne, the queen came gliding into the United Nations in a black slip dress (or at least it looked black in the rapturous newsreels about the visit), high heels and a fur wrap. There was definitely no need for the fur wrap in the suffocating July heat on Tuesday — the queen wore a flowered suit and a curvy, elegant hat.

If the monarch, now 84, did not exactly sweep through the hall with the same grace as her 31-year-old self, the United Nations building itself looked rather more tattered, only now undergoing its first renovations since it was built around 1950.

Queen Elizabeth said that the greatest transformation she had witnessed in all her years was in social attitudes, saying that much change was caused by public pressure.

“Many of these sweeping advances have come about not because of governments, committee resolutions or central directives — although all these have played a part — but instead because millions of people around the world wanted them,” she said.

The United Nations, which has 192 members as opposed to the 82 when the queen last spoke, has adapted to these changes, she said. In 1957, there were just three international operations. Now there are 26, she noted, deploying 120,000 men and women around the world. The body faced important new challenges in the form of ills like terrorism and climate change, she said.

“It has perhaps always been the case that the waging of peace is the hardest form of leadership of all,” said the queen.

The General Assembly hall is usually a sleepy place; it is not unusual for speakers to address row after row of empty seats. But nearly every seat was full for the queen, and it was standing room only in the upstairs galleries.

Ban Ki-moon, the secretary-general, introduced the queen with an homage of his own. “In a changing and churning world, you are an anchor for our age,” he said, noting that her reign spans decades — “from the challenges of the cold war to the threat of global warming, from the Beatles to Beckham.”

Queen Elizabeth said that people reviewing her speech 53 years hence would probably have a perspective of a world just as different as the world was when she addressed the General Assembly 53 years ago.

“When people in 53 years from now look back on us, they will doubtless view many of our practices as old-fashioned,” she said. “But it is my hope that, when judged by future generations, our sincerity, our willingness to take a lead and our determination to do the right thing will stand the test of time.”

The audience applauded politely at the end.

“It was short and sweet,” said Alexa Goncalves, a British resident of Long Island who had finagled a ticket from friends. Because the queen was headed to the site of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and a nearby memorial garden for the Britons killed, Ms. Goncalves said she wished the monarch had been a little more forceful on the issue of terrorism. “I thought it would be a little more powerful,” she said. “This would be the forum to get it out to a lot more people.”

The Sudanese ambassador, Abdalmahmood Abdalhaleem, not know for his love of Western institutions, was rather more diplomatic, noting that Queen Elizabeth had nearly “a century of wisdom” to share.

“It was nice,” he said. “Not too long.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

All I can say is GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!!

Being 100% Irish catholic I’m sure she feels the same about me as I do of her.

The Queen has done a wonderful job these past 58 years,

The United Kingdom and the world are lucky to have her.

Down with the crown!

We have few enough institutions to celebrate. The Queen continues to demonstrate such grace and dignity as makes us all feel a part of something larger and better. Ad multos annos.

When the revolution comes…

I wish she were here longer. I am American, but nonetheless, long live the Queen!

Your Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, on behalf of the British Commonwealth Subjects and citizens, and WW II veterans of The Royal Navy and Royal Merchant Marines, I take great pleasure in presenting this tribute as a token of our love and appreciation for all that you have done for us. As a Former Civil Servant with Royal Commissions for Speeches to Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother and His Royal Highness The Duke of Edinburgh, I am honoured to welcome you to pay tribute at Ground Zero and to address the United Nations General Assembly in New York City today. God Saved Our Queen..

Perley J. Thibodeau July 6, 2010 · 5:28 pm

Show us the part where she openly snubbed Bloomberg!

Perley J. Thibodeau July 6, 2010 · 5:32 pm

Oh, oh.
All my furs are faux
Does that mean I’m not a real queen?

I am 100% Irish and raised Catholic, and I think this particular lady is in a niche all by herself. She is a class act far above any other king or queen I can think of current or past. We should enjoy her company for neither we nor the British monarchy will ever see the likes of her again. In fact, I doubt the monarchy itself will outlive her by too long.

Have a safe trip home, and thanks for stopping by, Ma’am.

This is an embarrassment for the developed nations – democracies – for whom she serves as irrelevant and feeble head of state.

In Scotland she is Elizabeth I not II. So how can she be QE II in the US?

July 6, 2010

Queen Elizabeth is of the finest royalty; incarnating beautiful human dignity; so very mature in earned touch with the quest for us all to live leading causes needed on our Earth.

Even with 102 degrees in her visit to New York City with today’s heat wave she prevails the extreme weather; for her life is one of grace, courage, and the elegant symbol of all that is best in all global family’s struggles.

Her goal is for us learning to live gracefully with each other; and doing better for there are record on high and in journal for all times.

The United Nations is so fortunate to have her speak and with fitting natural aspirations towards all better sharing our best from our hearts and our minds.

As well her Grace gives wonderful dignity for encouraging collective United Nation’s efforts: to place money, energy, and correct ethics; wherever on Earth as she’s surely representative guardianship for our human family.

Let’s hope that all of us and our own royal selves learn from her journey and give Queen Elizabeth our utmost praise and loving thank you.

Joseph Amato
Manhattan, N. Y.

Frederick Glaysher July 6, 2010 · 5:41 pm

A very crude, cynical article that the NYT ought to be ashamed of having published… an unworthy piece would-be journalism.

Tracy James Burton July 6, 2010 · 5:41 pm

The Queen serves as the final balance of power in British society. It is the respect and power that is associated with the crown that keeps our government in-check.

I am breathless…how I wished to be one of the seated. For eight minutes out of a wishful lifetime to have made such an exchange. Grace be of God and man.

Truth be known that Queen Elizabeth surpassed categorical rhetoric and nomenclatura.

Perhaps the dissonance of the gallery surfeit senses. I too wonder whether or not a gallery unknown will possess any cognition to that end.

John #2 must mean the Queen wishes him goodwill and peace, and it’s nice that he does the same for her.

all current monarchies are in their final moments……as is the current structure of the United Nations….that’s why she gave this speech now….she knows all this and more…..

Long to reign over us,
God save the Queen!

John (see #2 above), I am 100% Irish Catholic and I respect Queen Elizabeth. She personally had nothing to do with the English domination of Ireland which ended in 1923 (where have you been?). In fact, she is a friend of Mary McAleese, Ireland’s President, and it’s likely the Queen will visit the Republic of Ireland very soon. In addition, she has shown towering dignity, stability and resiliancy in her public and private life. She deserves nothing but admiration and respect.

I can’t believe the other news media say Queen Elizabeth will be out of cash by 2012.

Queen Elizabeth had a right to address UN general Assembly after 53 years, because she is still a queen when mother Earth and Nations around the Globe are about to fall apart.

Well done Lillibet!

Come back more often.

“Being 100% Irish catholic I’m sure she feels the same about me as I do of her.”

Hear hear, John. If only the UN peacekeepers were around to defend Indian civilians from the British in Amristar.