Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Children in North Kivu province, DRC
Children in North Kivu province, DRC. More than 250 million people in Africa – one in five – are malnourished. Photograph: Christian Jepsen/NRC
Children in North Kivu province, DRC. More than 250 million people in Africa – one in five – are malnourished. Photograph: Christian Jepsen/NRC

Wiping out hunger in Africa could cost just $5bn. What are we waiting for?

This article is more than 4 years old
Feike Sijbesma

Ripping off the bandage of food aid and investing in self-sufficiency is the only way to fight malnutrition

Billions are spent on humanitarian aid, yet nearly 60 million children across Africa go to bed hungry.

Efforts to alleviate the constant cycle of droughts, poverty and war have caused new problems. The biggest of these is a crippling dependency on food aid that is undermining much of the continent’s efforts to feed itself.

UN figures show that more than 250 million people in Africa – one in five – are undernourished, making them vulnerable to disease, deficiencies and developmental stunting that stops them reaching their full potential. It has to change.

Richer donor countries need to show they are serious about helping to eradicate malnutrition and hunger by ripping off the bandage of food aid. This sounds counterintuitive, but donors need to invest in agriculture and local food manufacturing instead so that African countries can become self-sufficient. But this requires a bold new approach funded by public-private investment.

Local food projects exist, but few are capable of scale. The answer lies in initiatives such as Africa Improved Foods (AIF). Started two years ago in Rwanda, it is the first big public-private partnership in Africa to specifically address malnutrition and hidden hunger.

In one year of operation, and with an investment of only $70m (£55m), it has already helped more than two million people to avert malnutrition. AIF purchases locally grown maize and other crops from more than 24,000 smallholder farmers – mostly women – at set prices that guarantee a predictable income for them. These crops are locally processed in a factory in Kigali, where a nutritious “super cereal” is produced for mothers and young kids in the region.

An independent study commissioned by the IFC (International Finance Corporation of the World Bank Group) and conducted by the University of Chicago estimates that from 2016 to 2031, AIF will generate $756m for the people of Rwanda. If this initiative was replicated just 75 times, we could achieve lasting food security in Africa.

Can we put a price on eradicating hunger? Based on the AIF example, it could cost as little as $5bn. To put this in context, official aid to Africa was $29bn in 2017, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Yet hunger is once again rising, wiping out almost a decade of progress. Millions remain in poverty and their prospects are poor

Importing staple foods into the continent when 60% of the population still lives on the land is madness by any measure. We can do better. It is time for a new approach, one that creates locally produced food for a local population.

This is not about the world saving Africa. Real and profitable business opportunities exist, all the way along the supply chain from farmers to the market. Investing in Africa’s food security is socially responsible, too. Governments must also play their part, committing to sourcing food locally and reducing costly imports.

Investing in agriculture would bring other benefits. Enhanced regional economic security would reduce the factors that trigger displacement and war. Aid agencies such as the UN’s World Food Programme could use surplus crops from African farmers to supply conflict zones. A regional food network could get food to drought-hit regions such as the Sahel faster and more efficiently.

Greater food security would also address the poverty and despair that drive so many Africans to migrate, risking – and in many cases losing – their lives trying to cross the Mediterranean to reach Europe.

Why do people still go hungry? – video

Famines grab headlines, but malnutrition robs children of their future. It has irreversible effects. If children don’t get the right nutrients and vitamins early in the first 1,000 days of life, their brain development is impaired and they grow up stunted – shorter, weaker and with learning difficulties that severely limit their potential as adults.

Food aid does not help fight malnutrition because the bulk of it comprises calorie-rich but nutrient-light carbohydrates such as maize meal. It doesn’t prevent stunting or other serious health issues such as anaemia. It can even make countries poorer because ill people cannot work and need more health care. According to the Global Nutrition Report, better nutrition could deliver at least $16 for every $1 invested in the local economy, simply by improving general health.

Food security in Africa is an achievable goal. Private companies need to step forward to invest in that brighter future. Together with local farmers and governments, we can eradicate hunger in Africa.

  • Feike Sijbesma is CEO of global life sciences company Royal DSM. AIF is a partnership between Royal DSM, the Dutch development bank FMO, the UK development finance CDC Group, the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation and the Rwandan government

  • Comments on this piece are premoderated to ensure discussion remains on topics raised by the writer. Please be aware there may be a short delay in comments appearing on the site.

Most viewed

Most viewed